Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 16:20:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB29F0AE3235D18DDF039F1F4F7D7A22FEB50FFF9637AEBFE07DB73368591E89
Participant Details

Original Note:

Instead of citing vetted information Poilievre opted to run with an inflammatory and unconfirmed media report. When questioned on his decision, rather than answer Poilievre chose to attack the reporter. NNN on the post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729468626271408340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB29F0AE3235D18DDF039F1F4F7D7A22FEB50FFF9637AEBFE07DB73368591E89
  • createdAtMillis - 1701188420399
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729468626271408340AB29F0AE3235D18DDF039F1F4F7D7A22FEB50FFF9637AEBFE07DB73368591E89