Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 15:07:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25C7E642630F3F281137101E9DC3295C2DA40AF989CEF78C5952BB5ECA05D4AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Instead of citing vetted information Poilievre opted to run with an inflammatory and unconfirmed media report. When questioned on his decision, rather than answer Poilievre chose to attack the reporter. NNN on the post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729468626271408340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25C7E642630F3F281137101E9DC3295C2DA40AF989CEF78C5952BB5ECA05D4AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1701184054231
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172946862627140834025C7E642630F3F281137101E9DC3295C2DA40AF989CEF78C5952BB5ECA05D4AB