Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 14:13:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 009EDD7B59A86D511D11BDC46A2842C71626B25612FA08C84CE094BDA58BE484
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Don't abuse CNs for commentary. Although the note is factually correct and this business model appears dubious, this belongs to the comments. The original post is not misleading or incorrect.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729224600674783316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 009EDD7B59A86D511D11BDC46A2842C71626B25612FA08C84CE094BDA58BE484
  • createdAtMillis - 1701180802226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729224600674783316009EDD7B59A86D511D11BDC46A2842C71626B25612FA08C84CE094BDA58BE484