Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 20:03:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE80E5F2E61C0D90D0FDE9C7F70BC91E9FC60709E2DDCC0AA58CA0D46B7E6154
Participant Details

Original Note:

"... has already ruled even before hearing or seeing the real evidence." The portion that the judge ruled on was a case of fact (or "documents case"), in which he reviewed the evidence. Witnesses are not required when the decision is simply if something exists or not. https://www.legaldive.com/news/Trump-Organization-fraud-judgment-Engoron-overvaluations/694970/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729219366590562440
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE80E5F2E61C0D90D0FDE9C7F70BC91E9FC60709E2DDCC0AA58CA0D46B7E6154
  • createdAtMillis - 1701115386475
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1729219366590562440EE80E5F2E61C0D90D0FDE9C7F70BC91E9FC60709E2DDCC0AA58CA0D46B7E6154