Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 18:51:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE41101E8880946AD8079C7C3BBBED30FBCAF67F298B8F1D6C7210072419BFCB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The congestion charge was not a decision Daniel Zeichner had any voting power on. The decision to withdraw proposals for a congestion charge was local decision made by the Greater Cambridge Partnership. https://cities-today.com/plans-for-cambridge-congestion-charge-dropped/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729177209749881295
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE41101E8880946AD8079C7C3BBBED30FBCAF67F298B8F1D6C7210072419BFCB
  • createdAtMillis - 1701111097113
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729177209749881295AE41101E8880946AD8079C7C3BBBED30FBCAF67F298B8F1D6C7210072419BFCB