Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 16:35:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 76F4ABC0C271DDC8D50D5D12B318600628A619F0D9BC3581AB10CD84E852CDB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The quoted tweet in the image expresses the correct claim that AI art trained on AI art makes the errors of AI further stand out. The solution being to train on original content only furthers this point. Also, it’s clearly a joke post, anyway. NNN, regardless of if it’s correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729149210409185701
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 76F4ABC0C271DDC8D50D5D12B318600628A619F0D9BC3581AB10CD84E852CDB6
  • createdAtMillis - 1701102927654
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172914921040918570176F4ABC0C271DDC8D50D5D12B318600628A619F0D9BC3581AB10CD84E852CDB6