Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 15:03:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD0AE97EAC44E51AC80256D9ED82D7ABE53398010124B9015FE5EA3E1613814F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not quite correct. The AI feeding on itself would make it prone to its previous biases, however further training on the original data (billions of images before AI) will lead to improvements. There is also bound to be a vetting process if not already present https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/ai-art-will-soon-become-a-feedback-loop-of-hidden-biases-heres-what-that-looks-like

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729108549186326611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD0AE97EAC44E51AC80256D9ED82D7ABE53398010124B9015FE5EA3E1613814F
  • createdAtMillis - 1701097437156
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729108549186326611CD0AE97EAC44E51AC80256D9ED82D7ABE53398010124B9015FE5EA3E1613814F