Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 12:53:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84F3FBEA5D816C1AA49E4135252CAE0E6417C22C439F9B870190B60E04525673
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not quite correct. The AI feeding on itself would make it prone to its previous biases, however further training on the original data (billions of images before AI) will lead to improvements. There is also bound to be a vetting process if not already present https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/ai-art-will-soon-become-a-feedback-loop-of-hidden-biases-heres-what-that-looks-like

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729108549186326611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84F3FBEA5D816C1AA49E4135252CAE0E6417C22C439F9B870190B60E04525673
  • createdAtMillis - 1701089587781
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172910854918632661184F3FBEA5D816C1AA49E4135252CAE0E6417C22C439F9B870190B60E04525673