Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 12:17:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 631F0FB8F7E19BBED8F27D5E7A79788C63894C0DA7F325D698640046B7AE2456
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not quite correct. The AI feeding on itself would make it prone to its previous biases, however further training on the original data (billions of images before AI) will lead to improvements. There is also bound to be a vetting process if not already present https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/ai-art-will-soon-become-a-feedback-loop-of-hidden-biases-heres-what-that-looks-like

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729108549186326611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 631F0FB8F7E19BBED8F27D5E7A79788C63894C0DA7F325D698640046B7AE2456
  • createdAtMillis - 1701087460867
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729108549186326611631F0FB8F7E19BBED8F27D5E7A79788C63894C0DA7F325D698640046B7AE2456