Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 12:29:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F4560C5068243ABB77E8E71148B5D2AE6F91BF0F0A381D16301E008277C4616
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not quite correct. The AI feeding on itself would make it prone to its previous biases, however further training on the original data (billions of images before AI) will lead to improvements. There is also bound to be a vetting process if not already present https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/ai-art-will-soon-become-a-feedback-loop-of-hidden-biases-heres-what-that-looks-like

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729108549186326611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F4560C5068243ABB77E8E71148B5D2AE6F91BF0F0A381D16301E008277C4616
  • createdAtMillis - 1701088194756
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17291085491863266114F4560C5068243ABB77E8E71148B5D2AE6F91BF0F0A381D16301E008277C4616