Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 12:04:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40690C9FBC293716DB83BECCC3FED4AAB30A3D02EDB265ED32BC643E791943E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

元々の漫画を読んだ私見を述べたポストであり、訂正は不要です。 また本件は裁判員裁判全体ではなく性犯罪の裁判員裁判の男女不均衡について可能性を述べています。 過去中国新聞が当該不均衡について報じた記録もあります。 https://www.ajwrc.org/1148

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729100949753561588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40690C9FBC293716DB83BECCC3FED4AAB30A3D02EDB265ED32BC643E791943E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1701086695363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172910094975356158840690C9FBC293716DB83BECCC3FED4AAB30A3D02EDB265ED32BC643E791943E5