Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 12:04:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66D2E3993659298CD1D1861B59D9BAECCBAFDBC51B29172B1E46058A25FA3BA5
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence PCR tests used for COVID-19 are defective. The false positive rate should be close to zero. Most false-positive results are thought to be due to lab contamination or other problems with how the lab has performed the test, not limitations of the test itself https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/which-test-is-best-for-covid-19-2020081020734

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1728995672743989535
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66D2E3993659298CD1D1861B59D9BAECCBAFDBC51B29172B1E46058A25FA3BA5
  • createdAtMillis - 1701086674657
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 172899567274398953566D2E3993659298CD1D1861B59D9BAECCBAFDBC51B29172B1E46058A25FA3BA5