Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-26 19:16:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A27D6C064193C3DA5F4CB8E370194232C9E841B512C23A7D72BCC7E2739B5A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author wants to demonstrate how an artificial intelligence is not able to choose between the lives of many people and the use of a morally unacceptable phrase (not heard by anyone). This depends on the priorities with which it was programmed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1728690546766442759
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A27D6C064193C3DA5F4CB8E370194232C9E841B512C23A7D72BCC7E2739B5A7
  • createdAtMillis - 1701026190889
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17286905467664427592A27D6C064193C3DA5F4CB8E370194232C9E841B512C23A7D72BCC7E2739B5A7