Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-26 07:28:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1758EF26B59343F7F4BE55C427A4B73CED1668CB4D3D9AA0C27BD521DFE174D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. the proposed note is an opinion with no evidence to backup, which belongs in the comments, do not force your opinion on readers, stop abusing CN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1728672143246831674
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1758EF26B59343F7F4BE55C427A4B73CED1668CB4D3D9AA0C27BD521DFE174D
  • createdAtMillis - 1700983698224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1728672143246831674C1758EF26B59343F7F4BE55C427A4B73CED1668CB4D3D9AA0C27BD521DFE174D