Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-26 11:25:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2928B731E0D85F12E6A130C728F44AEF44B8846D5E21DD51A1938E5DDE7F8BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Krassenstein “journalists” are excellent engagement-hypers, but made no misleading assumptions about human biology. This post is satire at worst

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1728497255676555692
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2928B731E0D85F12E6A130C728F44AEF44B8846D5E21DD51A1938E5DDE7F8BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1700997907822
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1728497255676555692C2928B731E0D85F12E6A130C728F44AEF44B8846D5E21DD51A1938E5DDE7F8BC