Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-25 21:07:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF8CBD26CECA7AE894028FCC886643A07F5341F79CFC42E30C7402BB67CA98DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Krassenstein “journalists” are excellent engagement-hypers, but made no misleading assumptions about human biology. This post is satire at worst

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1728497255676555692
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF8CBD26CECA7AE894028FCC886643A07F5341F79CFC42E30C7402BB67CA98DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1700946445498
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1728497255676555692AF8CBD26CECA7AE894028FCC886643A07F5341F79CFC42E30C7402BB67CA98DE