Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-25 19:39:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 878E78B1BCCE8E6FE0A7E862E99DD095E89C47B1A7E876FBED3560AD604E0D43
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Krassenstein “journalists” are excellent engagement-hypers, but made no misleading assumptions about human biology. This post is satire at worst

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1728497255676555692
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 878E78B1BCCE8E6FE0A7E862E99DD095E89C47B1A7E876FBED3560AD604E0D43
  • createdAtMillis - 1700941166564
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1728497255676555692878E78B1BCCE8E6FE0A7E862E99DD095E89C47B1A7E876FBED3560AD604E0D43