Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-26 14:02:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E3ED1E731F03823BFBEE623E5660FE2A6E1A5AF2259F14A8FCC3D0077716DBD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Krassenstein “journalists” are excellent engagement-hypers, but made no misleading assumptions about human biology. This post is satire at worst

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1728497255676555692
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E3ED1E731F03823BFBEE623E5660FE2A6E1A5AF2259F14A8FCC3D0077716DBD
  • createdAtMillis - 1701007331600
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17284972556765556925E3ED1E731F03823BFBEE623E5660FE2A6E1A5AF2259F14A8FCC3D0077716DBD