Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-24 11:12:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E6F3409FAA1CD9D3CC415AB32F6B6BE039BEF3BD080787CE8B7834EF48910FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lähes kaikki tämän metatutkimuksen lähteistä on epidemiologisia tutkimuksia jotka toteutettiin kyselykaavakkeilla. Kyseinen metodi on yksi heikoimmista todisteista. Epidemiologiaa tulisi käyttää ainoastaan hypoteesien luomiseen eikä koskaan kokonaisen teorian rakentamiseen https://www.diagnosisdiet.com/full-article/epidemiological-studies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1728004671153824000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E6F3409FAA1CD9D3CC415AB32F6B6BE039BEF3BD080787CE8B7834EF48910FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1700824358695
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17280046711538240008E6F3409FAA1CD9D3CC415AB32F6B6BE039BEF3BD080787CE8B7834EF48910FF