Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-24 09:42:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A54D1B51E8BE83E56B6B2E9D8A33CE8DDF6ECD8F7E169AEF386D1EA25ECA5A7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - I think the author is making the point that the board had to immediately undo the action, not that the board didn’t literally fire him. I feel this is a pretty straightforward argument interpretation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727880625275940870
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A54D1B51E8BE83E56B6B2E9D8A33CE8DDF6ECD8F7E169AEF386D1EA25ECA5A7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1700818967338
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727880625275940870A54D1B51E8BE83E56B6B2E9D8A33CE8DDF6ECD8F7E169AEF386D1EA25ECA5A7D