Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-24 04:04:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4270719BEB4B8B86E5E1FC4D050BE66C2B30ED9B05CFE1F8C0B907069BD3367D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - I think the author is making the point that the board had to immediately undo the action, not that the board didn’t literally fire him. I feel this is a pretty straightforward argument interpretation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727880625275940870
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4270719BEB4B8B86E5E1FC4D050BE66C2B30ED9B05CFE1F8C0B907069BD3367D
  • createdAtMillis - 1700798682823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17278806252759408704270719BEB4B8B86E5E1FC4D050BE66C2B30ED9B05CFE1F8C0B907069BD3367D