Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-24 00:48:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09F879230ECF642136942D341254F4688000442FCD4ECD647C0AD8FA0309E2C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note IS needed because the headline certainly implies that Rayner is the owner of the £3,750 outfit when she isn’t.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727792957821014286
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 09F879230ECF642136942D341254F4688000442FCD4ECD647C0AD8FA0309E2C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1700786890593
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172779295782101428609F879230ECF642136942D341254F4688000442FCD4ECD647C0AD8FA0309E2C2