Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 19:20:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69916DF875D42C0E8ABC7E118E8D6C23C28A615FF99A7B9A950A9E6C16E91DA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

A decisão do juiz Paulo Baccarat considerou que Altman usou a expressão "ratos" para se referir aos judeus como um dog whistle. Além disso, considerou que o uso da expressão "racista" em algumas postagens era ofensivo, podendo configurar injúria ou calúnia. Link da decisão: https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cpopg/show.do?processo.codigo=2S001S5IU0000&processo.foro=100&processo.numero=1164015-57.2023.8.26.0100

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727703321568301352
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69916DF875D42C0E8ABC7E118E8D6C23C28A615FF99A7B9A950A9E6C16E91DA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1700767252560
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172770332156830135269916DF875D42C0E8ABC7E118E8D6C23C28A615FF99A7B9A950A9E6C16E91DA6