Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 14:15:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86
Participant Details

Original Note:

今回の判決を下したのは広島高裁の脇由紀裁判長であり女性です。https://iraw.rcc.jp/topics/articles/17256

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727689351319187861
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86
  • createdAtMillis - 1700748928070
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727689351319187861EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86