Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-24 10:03:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 744826A7DF02359622DFE13ADD88B32B28612CF562FA7DD42434F8DF2BFE53C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post is accurate representation of study. Discussions about the study's validity and alternative interpretations of data belong in the comments or, ideally, medical journal articles. 280 character Community Notes are not the correct venue.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727621552441553227
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 744826A7DF02359622DFE13ADD88B32B28612CF562FA7DD42434F8DF2BFE53C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1700820238575
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727621552441553227744826A7DF02359622DFE13ADD88B32B28612CF562FA7DD42434F8DF2BFE53C5