Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 10:40:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61D2617B0C1DCAEC60856CB59BBAD07F53484F1664A0C3AFA748BE37DEEDD04C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post is accurate representation of study. Discussions about the study's validity and alternative interpretations of data belong in the comments or, ideally, medical journal articles. 280 character Community Notes are not the correct venue.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727621552441553227
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61D2617B0C1DCAEC60856CB59BBAD07F53484F1664A0C3AFA748BE37DEEDD04C
  • createdAtMillis - 1700736005716
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172762155244155322761D2617B0C1DCAEC60856CB59BBAD07F53484F1664A0C3AFA748BE37DEEDD04C