Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 22:25:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1A03F5FD0542EBB9A39ED9349921B50FD1F9430C7FDAF802A8D523AC600226C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post is accurate representation of study. Discussions about the study's validity and alternative interpretations of data belong in the comments or, ideally, medical journal articles. 280 character Community Notes are not the correct venue.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727621552441553227
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1A03F5FD0542EBB9A39ED9349921B50FD1F9430C7FDAF802A8D523AC600226C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1700778346149
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17276215524415532271A03F5FD0542EBB9A39ED9349921B50FD1F9430C7FDAF802A8D523AC600226C1