Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 09:04:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FCCD4E12123E1A0EB2CF709C2392BF3397B9446BA053AE065E81A1766E66381
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 99% consensus claim was debunked. The study was flawed and highly biased, counting "neutral" and some "sceptic" studies as pro-consensus. https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/11/11/215

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727573263683854814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1FCCD4E12123E1A0EB2CF709C2392BF3397B9446BA053AE065E81A1766E66381
  • createdAtMillis - 1700730266346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17275732636838548141FCCD4E12123E1A0EB2CF709C2392BF3397B9446BA053AE065E81A1766E66381