Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 23:33:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7155B51D91F07359F31E6DD2F5575681450009EB85E8B1B620A023A0ED3F375D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Tweet literally linked the study it's referencing, with page numbers for each claim. To argue its accuracy or significance, use the comments. Furthermore, the tweet never refers to "exploding" cancer, and simply linking the "excess deaths in the UK" site isn't refutation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727556667414642941
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7155B51D91F07359F31E6DD2F5575681450009EB85E8B1B620A023A0ED3F375D
  • createdAtMillis - 1700782432460
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17275566674146429417155B51D91F07359F31E6DD2F5575681450009EB85E8B1B620A023A0ED3F375D