Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 10:51:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note both excludes outside spending (including AIPAC's) to claim Turner outspent Brown, then uses the results from the wrong election - Turner lost the expensive one by 6% and the rematch by 35%. Even if it were right, it also doesn't contradict what she said. https://ballotpedia.org/Nina_Turner_(Ohio) https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/house/OH/11/2022/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727553280560005548
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F
  • createdAtMillis - 1700736699947
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727553280560005548C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F