Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 00:33:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88B53012EB3274260E1FBA76861477E253ECC9B0C09A27F621BCAB5A5A2BA239
Participant Details

Original Note:

No existe ninguna evidencia empírica que demuestre lo que afirma la noticia, por lo que se podría considerar que su fin es la manipulación de la opinión pública. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202103/10/WS60487589a31024ad0baae3f2.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727460588530307457
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 88B53012EB3274260E1FBA76861477E253ECC9B0C09A27F621BCAB5A5A2BA239
  • createdAtMillis - 1700699581738
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 172746058853030745788B53012EB3274260E1FBA76861477E253ECC9B0C09A27F621BCAB5A5A2BA239