Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 02:17:38 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 046E5480E45D0C2FC43F9EBBE3B22604460F8E85B0E8F764794C803BAB069BA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

No existe ninguna evidencia empírica que demuestre lo que afirma la noticia, por lo que se podría considerar que su fin es la manipulación de la opinión pública. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202103/10/WS60487589a31024ad0baae3f2.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727460588530307457
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 046E5480E45D0C2FC43F9EBBE3B22604460F8E85B0E8F764794C803BAB069BA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1700705858280
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727460588530307457046E5480E45D0C2FC43F9EBBE3B22604460F8E85B0E8F764794C803BAB069BA8