Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-22 22:32:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F202FA2C15D9E1C3C4E43185AC6CBDB2AC31E3413B469A1BA4DB6E24431268DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CIA's review of their remote viewing program essentially found that it wasn't reliable. The methods they used to test it weren't detailed enough and the statistics they used to measure its success weren't precise, so they couldn't be sure the results were valid​​. Source: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00787r000100260003-2#:~:text=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727447854313083168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F202FA2C15D9E1C3C4E43185AC6CBDB2AC31E3413B469A1BA4DB6E24431268DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1700692332805
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727447854313083168F202FA2C15D9E1C3C4E43185AC6CBDB2AC31E3413B469A1BA4DB6E24431268DE