Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-24 02:03:55 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F07F48083A26E7920CF8CDBB1E25AD853CA8E3F1BDD8589A9E905FCA0C498653
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CIA's review of their remote viewing program essentially found that it wasn't reliable. The methods they used to test it weren't detailed enough and the statistics they used to measure its success weren't precise, so they couldn't be sure the results were valid​​. Source: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00787r000100260003-2#:~:text=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727447854313083168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F07F48083A26E7920CF8CDBB1E25AD853CA8E3F1BDD8589A9E905FCA0C498653
  • createdAtMillis - 1700791435628
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1727447854313083168F07F48083A26E7920CF8CDBB1E25AD853CA8E3F1BDD8589A9E905FCA0C498653