Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 01:30:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1B33C87FC930AC1E491F3ECAEC3BBB37DAC6FAB4505D6DA2FE39F5D9E4F5149
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CIA's review of their remote viewing program essentially found that it wasn't reliable. The methods they used to test it weren't detailed enough and the statistics they used to measure its success weren't precise, so they couldn't be sure the results were valid​​. Source: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00787r000100260003-2#:~:text=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727447854313083168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1B33C87FC930AC1E491F3ECAEC3BBB37DAC6FAB4505D6DA2FE39F5D9E4F5149
  • createdAtMillis - 1700703037932
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727447854313083168C1B33C87FC930AC1E491F3ECAEC3BBB37DAC6FAB4505D6DA2FE39F5D9E4F5149