Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-22 23:33:32 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B6E3C473B51EEF4FFE589FD233AA0AC1AC0729680AB782890B8388E4C621663
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CIA's review of their remote viewing program essentially found that it wasn't reliable. The methods they used to test it weren't detailed enough and the statistics they used to measure its success weren't precise, so they couldn't be sure the results were valid​​. Source: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00787r000100260003-2#:~:text=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727447854313083168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B6E3C473B51EEF4FFE589FD233AA0AC1AC0729680AB782890B8388E4C621663
  • createdAtMillis - 1700696012250
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17274478543130831688B6E3C473B51EEF4FFE589FD233AA0AC1AC0729680AB782890B8388E4C621663