Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-22 22:44:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71D08138B6C84FC2EAC63952B8B81DA6BC1006294E0747D3B351F11DDC7F17EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CIA's review of their remote viewing program essentially found that it wasn't reliable. The methods they used to test it weren't detailed enough and the statistics they used to measure its success weren't precise, so they couldn't be sure the results were valid​​. Source: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00787r000100260003-2#:~:text=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727447854313083168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71D08138B6C84FC2EAC63952B8B81DA6BC1006294E0747D3B351F11DDC7F17EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1700693088776
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172744785431308316871D08138B6C84FC2EAC63952B8B81DA6BC1006294E0747D3B351F11DDC7F17EC