Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-27 17:45:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 520B4C5C88017225C8E5F4CE90859BD9162B1F93E5588398690C18E1DF2CB6E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

JD continuously denied ever abusing AH, which is also shown given that the sole purpose of a defamation case is to prove the stated claims are lies. JD won his case, proving to a unanimous jury (& the world) that AH not only lied about abuse but she did so with actual malice! https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-verdict-forms.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727325336323436622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 520B4C5C88017225C8E5F4CE90859BD9162B1F93E5588398690C18E1DF2CB6E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1703699148726
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727325336323436622520B4C5C88017225C8E5F4CE90859BD9162B1F93E5588398690C18E1DF2CB6E4