Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-22 14:27:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4689431091BD6B502EC5CBAE3AB9EFE2DBA0F6B0A82AE1E595D705036AFB0C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet is clearly based on a reliable source. Discussion whether that source is erroneous in this case belongs in the replies. The links given in the first proposed note are useless. Context is removed because they respond to tweets from a suspended account.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727265679571566623
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4689431091BD6B502EC5CBAE3AB9EFE2DBA0F6B0A82AE1E595D705036AFB0C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1700663266603
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727265679571566623B4689431091BD6B502EC5CBAE3AB9EFE2DBA0F6B0A82AE1E595D705036AFB0C4