Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-22 16:02:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D53F1FB754ADD9222283234D98D9276AE50F6B9E386C654E818DE977EFEFDB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Haaretz is not an impartial source, and therefore an unreliable one.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727253771334398073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D53F1FB754ADD9222283234D98D9276AE50F6B9E386C654E818DE977EFEFDB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1700668943654
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17272537713343980737D53F1FB754ADD9222283234D98D9276AE50F6B9E386C654E818DE977EFEFDB3