Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-22 13:09:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 537BFAD7C0BB6AA5B99919C2E4B8484765C67DC6753BE397209CD30781DED5BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Haaretz is not an impartial source, and therefore an unreliable one.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727253771334398073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 537BFAD7C0BB6AA5B99919C2E4B8484765C67DC6753BE397209CD30781DED5BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1700658559179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727253771334398073537BFAD7C0BB6AA5B99919C2E4B8484765C67DC6753BE397209CD30781DED5BD