Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-25 14:13:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65A2E9A746B239522A5D8DE009AE22CE0F827B6C532BE2DA874BF1C9A2EA19B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Apesar da página postar periodicamente notícias falsas, este comentário trata-se de uma opinião pessoal da página sob a postagem original da Folha, não cabendo a notas da comunidade refutar através deste recurso a confiabilidade da página neste contexto.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726982620695658777
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65A2E9A746B239522A5D8DE009AE22CE0F827B6C532BE2DA874BF1C9A2EA19B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1700921620610
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172698262069565877765A2E9A746B239522A5D8DE009AE22CE0F827B6C532BE2DA874BF1C9A2EA19B3