Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-20 17:44:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 696C320ED07D5285A08853F5913A4F36718873DE0E8AE035201E6155E6C296DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Esse caso não é resultado prático do posicionamento do STJ/STF como o post da a entender, os acusados foram liberados na audiência de custodia, a decisão do STF só tem efeito depois da sentença, antes dela existe outras ferramentas como a prisão preventiva e cautelar. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/prisao-cautelar-e-prisao-preventiva/348336409 https://portal.stf.jus.br/noticias/verNoticiaDetalhe.asp?idConteudo=429359&ori=1 https://www.tjdft.jus.br/institucional/imprensa/campanhas-e-produtos/direito-facil/edicao-semanal/prisoes-cautelares#:~:text=Trata-se%20de%20uma%20forma,ou%20diligências%20necessárias%20ao%20inquérito.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726652014304571547
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 696C320ED07D5285A08853F5913A4F36718873DE0E8AE035201E6155E6C296DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1700502249670
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1726652014304571547696C320ED07D5285A08853F5913A4F36718873DE0E8AE035201E6155E6C296DD