Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-21 12:01:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC74DC83B8361C3E00785C26A6221AEB2862D164549A332AE6AA25F3BE6E840C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The draft report from the Advertising Standards Authority does not challenge the science behind ULEZ or say that TfL 'lied'. The ASA challenges whether or not the use of modelled data was made clear enough in TfL adverts. This is clear in the article linked, as well as: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sadiq-khan-misled-public-about-ulez-benefits-report-finds-qgsl9hppv https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/ulez-adverts-asa-watchdog-sadiq-khan-london-b1121413.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726558027438846058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC74DC83B8361C3E00785C26A6221AEB2862D164549A332AE6AA25F3BE6E840C
  • createdAtMillis - 1700568107830
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1726558027438846058AC74DC83B8361C3E00785C26A6221AEB2862D164549A332AE6AA25F3BE6E840C