Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-20 04:00:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D78476C0192D93CB562396449DE6224524144C833632F02A74A76C7C3B2A1462
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims made in this tweet are not supported by the study being referenced (see link). The study itself states the tests used were subject to inaccuracies and the results should not be generalized. It states that additional research is needed to validate their findings. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.230743

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726439316573020478
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D78476C0192D93CB562396449DE6224524144C833632F02A74A76C7C3B2A1462
  • createdAtMillis - 1700452856155
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1726439316573020478D78476C0192D93CB562396449DE6224524144C833632F02A74A76C7C3B2A1462