Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-20 04:02:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7E8CCCDBB26F04774FA1531E53886976DF726A753F826BCF32FE4F2E27553D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims made in this tweet are not supported by the study being referenced (see link). The study itself states the tests used were subject to inaccuracies and the results should not be generalized. It states that additional research is needed to validate their findings. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.230743

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726439316573020478
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7E8CCCDBB26F04774FA1531E53886976DF726A753F826BCF32FE4F2E27553D3
  • createdAtMillis - 1700452969531
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1726439316573020478B7E8CCCDBB26F04774FA1531E53886976DF726A753F826BCF32FE4F2E27553D3