Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-20 12:00:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20C1A0BAD59F471EACA129EC6EBDCB36AD76C2FA20334EAC9CB7699283456332
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims made in this tweet are not supported by the study being referenced (see link). The study itself states the tests used were subject to inaccuracies and the results should not be generalized. It states that additional research is needed to validate their findings. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.230743

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726439316573020478
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20C1A0BAD59F471EACA129EC6EBDCB36AD76C2FA20334EAC9CB7699283456332
  • createdAtMillis - 1700481633626
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 172643931657302047820C1A0BAD59F471EACA129EC6EBDCB36AD76C2FA20334EAC9CB7699283456332