Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-19 17:34:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post says X followed Y, then posted proof of the correlation and underlying events. The post only makes a claim about timing - not causation. The proposed CN citing to a proposed Twitter lawsuit doesn’t make sense. Please just post replies if you disagree.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726285763401122111
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1700415260669
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17262857634011221114A27520EE411DEC876F4D77139A3E2979FE3D4A46800669FDC69FBFDA5FE79AE