Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-11-19 17:24:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The post never refers that what happened on October 7 was civilian collateral damage. Besides, collateral damage is a valid term under IHL, and the post refers to the principle of proportionality which states that there must not be excessive loss of civilian life. https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2022/05/05/collateral-damage-indirect-fire-populated-areas/#:~:text=Collateral%20damage%20is%20the%20unintended,the%20target%20of%20the%20attack. https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/proportionality#:~:text=The%20principle%20of%20proportionality%20prohibits,and%20direct%20military%20advantage%20anticipated%E2%80%9D.
All Note Details