Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-19 16:50:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E80E4C4E30D96F3B805AE274690EDAA5C11E9D800560FA4AB7083B36E0B9CB09
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN : Il n'y a rien de factuellement faux dans le post qui donne un avis personnel. Veuillez utilisez les commentaires pour débattre et vous conformez aux conditions d'utilisation des notes de la communauté.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726220897378271605
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E80E4C4E30D96F3B805AE274690EDAA5C11E9D800560FA4AB7083B36E0B9CB09
  • createdAtMillis - 1700412602320
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1726220897378271605E80E4C4E30D96F3B805AE274690EDAA5C11E9D800560FA4AB7083B36E0B9CB09